Monday, January 25, 2010

Speedboat Prices Are Either One Of These Contracts?

Are either one of these contracts? - speedboat prices

Justin has had four speedboats Name porpoise, Priscilla, providence, and prudence. On 2 Justin April has written offers to sell the four ships in the order in the name of $ 4200 each, Charles, Diana, Edward, and France, respectively, so that ten days prior to the adoption. Is a contract formed in C or D? and why?

c. Edward, 3 April this year, said he was interested in the purchase of Providence, but said that the price seems a bit much, and wondered whether Justin would be willing to sell the boat to $ 3900th Five days later, after receiving no response from Justin, Justin Edward accepted the offer, via letter, and enclosed a certified check for $ 4,200.
d. Fran was in a car accident killla 9th April. The next day, the executor of the estate by e-mail an acceptance of candidacy of Justin Justin.

3 comments:

Mr. Mysterio said...

A contract was formed in C, because no consideration - a certificate is enclosed for $ 4200th

A contract was drawn up in D, because regardless of the assumption (not that the money was sent with the acceptance, so I think it is not) adopted for the purposes of the Act. In addition, the offer was made to a woman, as she was still alive and probably for your pleasure. It is the question of whether Fran authorized the purchase in the event of your death. Your executor May abusing their powers and resources misuing property. This is speculation from me, because I do not know what in his will.

The answer is probable that the offer remains open after his wife's death.

There is a wealth of information not provided in the question are available. Is this homework, expect to work through all the options that you. The next time you try to work for themselves, to understand the concepts - after all, you are not able to rely on Yahoo Answers for examinations.

seandash... said...

c. Maybe. The offer would likely be challenged on the way, Justin, if the resistance now, a time limitation (can vary, depending) who is the law you use.

d.Yes. Act instead of the victims and the authors approval prior to the expiration date sent 10 days.

The performance of the previous answer was not applicable because the review must be in agreement, but the end is not required prior to the formation of the contract - so you have only one meeting, the mind, based on the offer and acceptance.

This is the U.S. law on the street.

seandash... said...

c. Maybe. The offer would likely be challenged on the way, Justin, if the resistance now, a time limitation (can vary, depending) who is the law you use.

d.Yes. Act instead of the victims and the authors approval prior to the expiration date sent 10 days.

The performance of the previous answer was not applicable because the review must be in agreement, but the end is not required prior to the formation of the contract - so you have only one meeting, the mind, based on the offer and acceptance.

This is the U.S. law on the street.

Post a Comment